China pursues 52 km collider project – physicsworld.com

China pursues 52 km collider project – physicsworld.com

Forging a Career in Academia

Forging a Career in Academia

What the Tamiflu saga tells us about drug trials and big pharma

What the Tamiflu saga tells us about drug trials and big pharma

Relativistic Baseball

Relativistic Baseball

Nobel Prize for Physics

Nobel Prize for Physics

Can scientists be social?

Yesterday I wrote about my quest to find good ways of reading the articles and other content I need for my research, and talked about the two tools Flipboard and Pocket that can make this a bit easier.

The next thing I’m looking for is a way to discover the papers and articles that I should be reading but just don’t know about. At the moment I do this manually by subscribing to journals and news services that I then flip through with Flipboard to find something interesting.

Continue reading “Can scientists be social?”

Keeping up with reading

One of the things I find hardest about being a scientist is keeping up-to-date with all the latest research. A number of times I’ve worked on some problem for days, weeks and even months before finding out that someone else has already solved the problem!

I’ve started looking to internet tools to help me keep up to date. My favourite two at the moment are Flipboard and Pocket.

Continue reading “Keeping up with reading”

Science’s function is to describe processes, but it cannot pronounce on the purpose of things. Physicists and biologists have a right to say that in looking at matter and life scientifically, no evident purpose is discovered. They overstep their limits if they go on to require faith in pure chance as opposed to faith in a creator. In any decision which may have to be made between faith in God or in ‘blind chance’, the science of evolution is strictly neutral, and cannot be anything else.

“Origins of Religion” by Robert Brow
in “The World’s Religions: A Lion Handbook”. Ed by R Pierce Beaver, Tring: Lion, 1982.1st Ed. pp.30–34